I just returned from my first visit with the ANTH 216 class. It did not go as well as I had hoped. First, the laptop that I brought to the classroom (not a library classroom as I’m used to) would not log on. Luckily RM had brought her laptop and I was able to connect, with screen and projection, in this “smart” classroom. This was not without its problems, however. I am not used to toggling between screen and laptop (the system is much easier in the library) and am not familiar with the F keys. I definitely need a tutorial in this. The plug, although tightly installed into the back of the laptop (or so I thought), came out as I attempted to hook up an audio cable. Nothing was working right as I tried to play a youtube video that I had hoped would set the stage for a discussion on culture and would lead us into some searching for different cultures. In the end, once we finally got everything back on track, we replayed the video, chewing up valuable time that I had counted on to set students up for their homework assignment. I didn’t get to fully explain and/or demonstrate what I had hoped and most likely left students with more questions than answers as they prepare their assignment for Thursday. Not a good way to start out a semester of teaching . . .
August 26, 2008
Not off to a great start
Posted by kdhoffman under Interactive learning | Tags: anthropology, course-integrated instruction, disappointment, student-centered activities, technology, time constraints |[2] Comments
August 26, 2008 at 4:43 pm
But it’s all up from here! And students got to see how well you handle yourself when technology fails — an important lesson information literacy lesson for everyone these days!
(sorry it went badly — I know how that feels!)
August 27, 2008 at 10:36 am
Thanks for the positive thoughts, Rudy. I get down on myself, especially when I put a lot of time and effort into something and it doesn’t go as well as I had hoped. Yesterday was a reality check of how lucky we are in the library to be surrounded by reliable technology and support. I just need to get used to the new teaching environment.
My post was intended for self-reflection, but also to be honest to anyone else collaborating that things will not always go smoothly. At this point, I have to think that the model where the librarian has the entire class period to do their thing, rather than just using a small portion of class time, works best. But I know other librarians who have a system worked out for teaching mini-lessons 7-8 times during the semester. I need to discover a happy medium.
I also need to remind myself that because I am included on RM’s LMS, I can continue the teaching to students via ANGEL. At the very least, I can clarify what needs to be done by tomorrow’s class.
Thanks again for your feedback, Rudy.